EPYC 4465P vs Intel Xeon Phi 3120A
We compared two server CPUs: EPYC 4465P with 12 cores 3.4GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 3120A with 57 cores 1.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC 4465P 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (65W vs 300W)
Score
General Parameters
May 2025
Release Date
Jun 2013
AMD
Manufacturer
PCIe
Server
Type
Server
Grado
Core Architecture
Knights Corner
AMD Socket AM5
Socket
PCIe x16
Radeon Graphics
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 5 (Grado))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Package
16.63 billions
Transistor Count
5 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
300 W
95°C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
2x70.6 mm²
Die Size
350 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
122 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
3.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
5.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
12
Total Core Count
57
24
Total Thread Count
228
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
34.0
Multiplier
11.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
64 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-5600
Memory Types
DDR3,DDR4
2
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
24
PCIe Lanes
-
