EPYC Embedded 8324P vs Opteron X2170
We compared two server CPUs: EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz and Opteron X2170 with 4 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.65GHz vs 2.4GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 28nm)
Opteron X2170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 180W)
Score
General Parameters
Sep 2023
Release Date
Sep 2016
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Steppe Eagle
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
AMD Socket FT3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Radeon R5E
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Opteron (X-Series)
Package
35.5 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
28 nm
180 W
Power Consumption
25 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
4x73 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
32
Total Core Count
4
64
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.5
Multiplier
24.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB shared
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3
6
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
96
PCIe Lanes
-
