EPYC Embedded 8324P vs Xeon 6369P
We compared two server CPUs: EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz and Xeon 6369P with 8 cores 3.3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 24MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)
Xeon 6369P 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4800)
Higher base frequency (3.3GHz vs 2.65GHz)
Lower TDP (95W vs 180W)
Score
General Parameters
Sep 2023
Release Date
Feb 2025
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake-R
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Xeon 6 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Package
35.5 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
180 W
Power Consumption
95 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
4x73 mm²
Die Size
257 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
32
Total Core Count
8
64
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.5
Multiplier
33.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800
6
Max Memory Channels
2
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
5
96
PCIe Lanes
16
