EPYC Embedded 8324P vs Xeon w5 2565X
We compared two server CPUs: EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz and Xeon w5 2565X with 18 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 37.5MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)
Lower TDP (180W vs 240W)
Xeon w5 2565X 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.65GHz)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
EPYC Embedded 8324P
1664
Xeon w5 2565X
+30%
2165
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
EPYC Embedded 8324P
13349
Xeon w5 2565X
+13%
15096
General Parameters
Sep 2023
Release Date
Aug 2024
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Sapphire Rapids
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
Intel Socket 4677
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Xeon W (Sapphire Rapids)
Package
35.5 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
180 W
Power Consumption
240 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
4x73 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
32
Total Core Count
18
64
Total Thread Count
36
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.5
Multiplier
32.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
37.5 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
1
-
AVX-512 FMA Ports
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
-
Max Memory Size
2 TB
6
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
5
96
PCIe Lanes
64
