FireGL V8650 vs Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
Arc A750
+3809%
17200
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
FireGL
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
DG2-512
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
