FireGL V8650 vs Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
Arc A780
+3995%
18020
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireGL
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6X
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
DG2-512
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
