FireGL V8650 vs FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
+450%
440
FirePro RG220A
80
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
May 2010
FireGL
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
868 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
1
320
Shading Units
80
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
M93
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
