FireGL V8650 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+903%
4416
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Nov 2019
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
320
Shading Units
1280
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
TU116
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
