Home Comparison FireGL V8650 vs GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

FireGL V8650 vs GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 +145%
1078

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

868 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GF100
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net