FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 1000W)
Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
18176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
2432
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+3260%
81720
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Oct 2024
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
304
1280
Shading Units
19456
80
TMUs
1216
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
1000W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
153 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
