FirePro S7000 vs T400 4 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
+122%
2432
T400 4 GB
1094
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1280
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU117
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6