FireStream 9250 vs CMP 100HX 210
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
CMP 100HX 210 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
4320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
CMP 100HX 210
+1075%
11750
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2020
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
555 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
80
800
Shading Units
5120
40
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GV100
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
