FireStream 9250 vs T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
416 additional rendering cores
T400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
T400
+9%
1094
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2021
FireStream
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
800
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
TU117
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6