FireStream 9250 vs CMP 170HX 8 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM CMP 170HX 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
CMP 170HX 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.49TB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
CMP 170HX 8 GB
+1163%
12630
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2021
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
1.49TB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
800
Shading Units
4480
40
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA100
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A