FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 220
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 220 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (58W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+594%
1000
GeForce GT 220
144
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2010
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
800
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
58W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
G94
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0