FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1518MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (84.10GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
+133%
2332
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2018
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1392 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1518 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
84.10GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.43 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.43 GFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.332 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.86 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GP107
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GP107-301-K1-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4