FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX TITAN X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 12GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
GeForce GTX TITAN X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1089MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+569%
6691
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Mar 2015
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1089 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
3072
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
104.5 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
209.1 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.691 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
209.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GM200
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GM200-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4