FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1470MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
+577%
6774
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2024
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1042 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
800
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.04 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.774 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.774 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA107
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GA107-325-K2-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
