FireStream 9250 vs Arc A580
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Arc A580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
Arc A580 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Arc A580
+1129%
12290
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Oct 2023
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 5)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1700 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
3072
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.536 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
DG2-512
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
