FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 170W)
GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1777MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
+1174%
12740
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Oct 2022
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1777 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1875 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
28
800
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
112
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.30 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
199.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.74 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.74 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
199.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
170W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA106
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GA106-302-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
12 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6