FireStream 9250 vs Radeon X800 GT AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GT AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 31.55GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Radeon X800 GT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2007
FireStream
Generation
Radeon R400 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
493 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
31.55GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.784 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.784 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x Molex
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
R420
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
R420 GT
(215RAACGA12F)
TeraScale
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.16 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
281 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.1
Shader Model
-
