FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 285W)
GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.2GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
6880 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB
+3909%
40090
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
504.2GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
60
800
Shading Units
7680
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
208.8 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
626.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.09 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.09 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
626.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
285W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD104
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
AD104-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
295 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.6