FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4090 D
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 425W)
GeForce RTX 4090 D 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1008GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
13792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce RTX 4090 D
+7254%
73540
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2023
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2280 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
1008GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
114
800
Shading Units
14592
40
TMUs
456
16
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
456
-
RT Cores
114
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1149 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
73.54 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.54 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1149 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
425W
450 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
AD102-250-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7