FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 360W)
GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock2617MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
9952 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER
+5528%
56280
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 50
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2617 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR7
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
1.02TB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
84
800
Shading Units
10752
40
TMUs
336
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
293.1 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
879.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
56.28 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
56.28 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
879.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
360W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GB203
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GB203-450-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
45.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
378 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
12.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.8