Home Comparison FireStream 9250 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

FireStream 9250 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +965%
10650

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1300 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
32
800
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
256
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
Unknown
256 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net