FireStream 9250 vs MTT S50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM MTT S50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
MTT S50 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
MTT S50
+391%
4915
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Oct 2023
FireStream
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
16
-
SM Count
800
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
153.6 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
153.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.830 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.915 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
85W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
TeraScale
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
Unknown
256 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
