FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX 5300 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon RX 5300 XT
+419%
5196
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Oct 2019
FireStream
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
22
800
Shading Units
1408
40
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 14
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
