FireStream 9250 vs NVS 810
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1033MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (68W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
NVS 810
+5%
1058
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2015
FireStream
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
902 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
68W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GM107
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
