FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Instinct MI308X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI308X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 750W)
Radeon Instinct MI308X 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
18656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon Instinct MI308X
+8072%
81720
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2023
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
304
800
Shading Units
19456
40
TMUs
1216
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
750W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
153 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
