FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon Pro 5300
+322%
4224
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2020
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
20
800
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
85W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 14
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
