Home Comparison FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Pro WX 4100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1201MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon Pro WX 4100 +146%
2460

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2016
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1125 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
16
800
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.22 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.460 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Baffin
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net