FireStream 9250 vs FirePro W4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
FirePro W4000
+26%
1267
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2012
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
12
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
