FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX 560
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 560 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon RX 560
+161%
2611
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2017
FireStream
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1175 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
16
800
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.40 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
81.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.611 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.611 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
163.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Polaris 21
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XT
(215-0908004)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
