Home Comparison FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition

FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 295W)
Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition +1166%
12660

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2017
FireStream
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1247 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
64
800
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.33 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
295W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Vega 10
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net