FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
+315%
4156
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2013
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GK110B
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GK110-301-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
