FireStream 9250 vs RTX A1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
RTX A1000
+573%
6737
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2024
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
727 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
800
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.737 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.737 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA107
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7