FireStream 9250 vs Tesla T10 16 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM Tesla T10 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla T10 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (403.2GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Tesla T10 16 GB
+899%
9999
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2020
FireStream
Generation
Tesla Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
403.2GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
800
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
TU102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
TU102-890-KCD-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8