FireStream 9250 vs Xe DG1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM Xe DG1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
160 additional rendering cores
Xe DG1 's Advantages
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Xe DG1
+98%
1984
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
Xe Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
640
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.00 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.968 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.984 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
496.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI
3x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
DG1
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
Unknown
256 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
