Home Comparison GeForce 310M vs RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation

GeForce 310M vs RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 6GB VRAM RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 35W)
RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2025MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
49
RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation +21063%
10370

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 300M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2025 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
20
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
97.20 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.37 TFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.37 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
162.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

14W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD107
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net