Home Comparison GeForce 310M vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile

GeForce 310M vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 16GB VRAM RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 80W)
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (896.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
7664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
49
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile +46920%
23040

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 300M
Generation
Blackwell-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR7
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
896.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
60
16
Shading Units
7680
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

14W
TDP
80W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GB203
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
45.6 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
378 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
1.2
CUDA
10.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net