GeForce 8400 GS PCI vs Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 8400 GS PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
2296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS PCI
22
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+25936%
5728
Graphics Card
Dec 2007
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.268 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
2.268 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
Ellesmere
G98-400-U2
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
