GeForce 8400 GS PCI vs Radeon Pro SSG
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 8400 GS PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 260W)
Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
4088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS PCI
22
Radeon Pro SSG
+55763%
12290
Graphics Card
Dec 2007
Release Date
Aug 2017
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.268 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
2.268 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
Vega 10
G98-400-U2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4