GeForce 8600M GT vs RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8600M GT and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 8600M GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8600M GT
61
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+21195%
12990
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 8M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1635 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
24
32
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
7.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
60.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
AD107
NB8P-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
