GeForce GT 140 OEM vs Radeon Instinct MI300A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 750W)
Radeon Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
19392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
208
Radeon Instinct MI300A
+39188%
81720
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Dec 2023
GeForce 100
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
19456
32
TMUs
1216
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
750W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
153 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
