GeForce GT 140 OEM vs Radeon R7 265
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 150W)
Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
208
Radeon R7 265
+810%
1894
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 100
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1