GeForce GT 140 OEM vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
208
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+5669%
12000
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 100
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
22
64
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
AD107
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
