GeForce GT 320 OEM vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 100W)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
5048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320 OEM
188
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+12155%
23040
Graphics Card
Feb 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 300
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
9
SM Count
40
72
Shading Units
5120
24
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
187.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
43W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
AD104
GT215-250-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
