GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
5008 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
363
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+6247%
23040
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
40
112
Shading Units
5120
56
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
AD104
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
