GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1392MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
+385%
2138
FireGL V8650
440
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 10
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1392 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
44.54 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
66.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
33.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.138 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
66.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
R600
GP107-400-A1
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
