GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
816 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+3461%
2849
FirePro 2460 Multi View
80
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
80
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Cedar
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
